SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (18921)7/22/2001 12:14:08 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
He probably is an expert on natural gas- as he is one of the Earth's largest producers.



To: cosmicforce who wrote (18921)7/22/2001 1:51:09 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
CosmicFart said - "for example, in Tunguska where the impact occured"

#reply-15018465

You said the only explanation was an impact, end of story. Tunguska will soon be proven to be the opposite of an impact. In the future try and leave science to scientists.

Perhaps ComicFarce, you wait for the popular journals to explain it to you in simple English before you jump to a conclusion that there is consensus on this issue.

english.pravda.ru



To: cosmicforce who wrote (18921)7/22/2001 2:07:36 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
The proof is Tunguska was the opposite of an impact, one so big you can't wrap your noodle around it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News