Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (48731)	7/23/2001 2:14:20 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Re: "C'mon Dan3 - 'splain that one ! When you understand how NT reported a loss of $19 Billion from one quarter to the next, you'll understand what it means to load up on "goodwill" and not take sufficient depreciation each quarter." TAP DANCE !!! TAP DANCE !!! Caught you in yet another LIE - and you TAP DANCE !!! around the problem with NO EXPLANATION.

To: Dan3 who wrote (48731)	7/23/2001 2:15:32 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 275872

Re: "One of the points I've tried to make in other posts is that Intel isn't accounting for enough of its real depreciation costs when it reports its earnings each quarter, while AMD is. " No kidding? So our litlle Dan3 is a lot smarter than Intel's accountants and auditors? Maybe you can explain why Intel's outside independent auditors - Ernst & Young - let Intel get away with falsifying their depreciation YEAR AFTER YEAR - whereas AMD's outside independent auditors - THE VERY SAME Ernst & Young - hold AMD to a much more rigorous depreciation schedule? C'mon Dan3 - 'splain that one !