Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnG who wrote (13190)	7/24/2001 9:39:04 AM
From: saukriver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196628

Still, wall street investment bankers would cut up their own garndmother if they thought that she was worth more as parts than as a whole person. Wrong. They would cut up their own grandmother even if they thought she might be worth less as parts than as a whole person. Their goal is to charge a fee for the cutting and then another fee for concluding that the parts are worth more together after all.

To: JohnG who wrote (13190)	7/24/2001 11:01:48 AM
From: Getch	Respond to of 196628

Can the cancellation of Spinco have any other meaning than Q is now in control of ALL agreements needed to produce multi-mode chips? The only purpose of Spinco was to provide access to those needed patents to produce the multi-mode chips, while protecting the income of QCOM from cross-license dilution. If the reason for Spinco is now removed, Q must have the needed access. Multi-mode chips are the future, this is another good day in the long march.