Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (164035)	7/24/2001 3:13:55 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Speaking of shamelessly biased "news": High Road" Anchor Baselessly Slammed GOP In 2000 CBS’s Dan Rather Condemns Condit News As "Speculation," But He Aired False Report Of GOP Dirty Trick Dan Rather insists that his non-coverage of the scandal surrounding Democratic Congressman Gary Condit is a journalistic virtue, not head-in-the-sand foolishness. An article in Monday’s New York Times quoted the CBS Evening News anchor’s explanation of his own rules for good reporting: "I’ve tried to stand for what I believe in -- decent, responsible journalism....When rumors, gossip, speculation and all this other stuff begin swirling, and other people begin reporting it -- frequently, I’m sorry to say, reporting it as fact -- my question always was, and continues to be, what do we know on the basis of our own reporting?" On Thursday’s Imus in the Morning radio program, Rather similarly claimed to be "high road, hard news," but during last year’s political campaign he presented his own specula-tion as news, baselessly accusing Republicans of detonating "a carefully orchestrated, politically motivated leak" on the last day of the Democratic National Convention. Here’s how Rather began the August 17, 2000 CBS Evening News: "Timing is everything. Al Gore must stand and deliver here tonight as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, and now Gore must do so against the backdrop of a potentially damaging, carefully orchestrated story leak about President Clinton. The story is that Republican-backed special prosecutor Robert Ray, Kenneth Starr’s successor, has a new grand jury looking into possible criminal charges against the President growing out of Mr. Clinton’s sex life." In fact, the story about the Clinton grand jury probe was accidentally leaked to an Associated Press reporter by a federal judge appointed by Democratic President Jimmy Carter. But Rather’s ignorance of the facts did not restrain his later prime time speculation about the "Republican-backed" prosecutor. "You don’t have to be a cynic to note that this has all the earmarks of a carefully orchestrated, politically motivated leak," Rather wrote at the time in a "Notebook" item for the CBS News Web site. While he now lectures the rest of the media about restraint, Rather has never apologized for the damage that his wild speculation may have caused to Ray or others. The CBS Evening News, however, did correct itself on Friday, August 18, 2000 -- when Rather was enjoying a post-convention vacation. www.mediaresearch.org

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (164035)	7/24/2001 4:02:10 PM
From: J.B.C.	Respond to of 769670

>>There's a helluva a lot more proof of global warming than there is of a god and I bet you're convinced of that, aren't you??<< Did I bring up God? Actually there isn't more proof, unless you account junk science as proof. The 1st "Earth Day" boasted banners that called for "Stop the Coming Ice Age", but how quickly the environmentalist flip-flop and forget, I'll bet you bought that hype and associated "proof" back then as well. As far as the Existence of God, that's between you and your Maker. Perhaps you will regret your decision to reject God at Judgement. And I'll be waiting anxiously for those European Signatures to start coming in: globalwarming.org

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (164035)	7/24/2001 4:51:47 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

>>>>There's a helluva a lot more proof of global warming than there is of a god. The article you posted has ZERO proof that global warming exists. I believe that there may be scientific proof that global warming exits. Proof that all of man's activity has done more than .1C is what seems to be missing But as with hens teeth I wait for someone to find it. tom watson tosiwmee