SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (164063)7/24/2001 5:37:14 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769667
 
I read the article with interest. The problem I see is that it takes enormous energy to create Aluminum or Zinc in the first place. Also recycling the Aluminum and Zinc will take enormous energy. Then of course you have all the really newly created chemicals that make the batteries work in the first place. I like the term batteries better than fuel cell. Can a replentishable metal fuel supply compete with the cost of hydrocarbons.

But for one shot backup they are/(may become) another alternative. Safer storage and high energy density.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: goldworldnet who wrote (164063)7/30/2001 7:24:56 AM
From: Bicycle  Respond to of 769667
 
Thank-you for providing such excellent additional information. As people begin to understand the technology and issues, we'll be making better decisions.

Bye4Now, FD.



To: goldworldnet who wrote (164063)7/30/2001 8:16:22 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 769667
 
Here's the flaw in eVonyx's strategy. If their battery works, and the Chinese can figure it out, they'll simply rip them off and make their own. The Chinese have NO respect for intellectual property rights.

That flaw in their thinking may be more dangerous to world prosperity then their nukes.