Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: asenna1 who wrote (164396)	7/25/2001 1:38:39 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769667

Your first use of the word bomb in any post to me occurred after you commented on a dialog between me and J_FShepard. as I recall. I have posted several times this to J_F. Now you call me snitch because you posted that I should construct a bomb and send it to someone and I objected (thought is was a dumb thing to do or suggest) and I had it removed. You were not penalized in any way. But you feel that anyone should be free to suggest that others build bombs and send them to innocent folks. The J_F_Shepard definition of a snitch Now if your defense is that you never read the above, well you have now. So if you wish to continue to reference bombs or like words associated with my name I can only conclude. From your constant need to make references that are clearly to the manufacturing of bombs, I conclude you believe that anyone should be free to suggest that others build bombs and send them to innocent folks. From the dialog that has occurred on this thread a review clearly shows that asenna1 user id=7807960 believes that anyone should be free to suggest that others build bombs and send them to innocent folks. I find this very stupid. As I have said in the past there are some tragic events that have occurred and there is extreme poor taste. There is not humor in joking about that others build bombs and send them to innocent folks. tom watson tosiwmee