SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/25/2001 6:55:33 PM
From: ColtonGang  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Going down down down........"And perhaps the most interesting trend, in October 1999 when George Bush was Governor of Texas, 68% of the public said he had strong qualities of leadership; by February 2000 that had slipped to 59%, and in the most recent New York Times/CBS News poll the number was only 54%."



To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/25/2001 7:08:24 PM
From: Ish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
<<Had Al Gore been elected president last November, word was that he intended to push the treaty through regardless of the Senate disapproval..................that takes guts, something Dubya sorely lacks! >>

Had Gore been elected the Kyoto Treaty would be exactly where it is today. Daym, you're supposed to be a doctor and you couldn't have graduated high school in Illinois. I had to pass a Constitution test.

The Senate has to ratify ANY treaty for it to become law. The Senate voted that the provisions in the Kyoto treaty could never be passed. Lieberman and Daschele even voted against it.



To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/25/2001 7:13:26 PM
From: J.B.C.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
>>word was that he intended to push the treaty through regardless of the Senate disapproval..................that takes guts....<<

Not to mention it would be nonbinding and likely overturned by the Senate, It's not called guts it's called stupidity, which Al has plenty of.

>>that takes guts,something Dubya sorely lacks!....<< Bwahahahaha. You guys rail the guy because he goes against the "World" and says that Kyoto is bad. He gets a tax cut bill against a group of thugs (the demoncrats). He forges ahead with a missile shield and gets Putin to consent to a new missile reduction treaty. All these take guts. And posting the BS that you just did takes guts as well.

Jim



To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/25/2001 7:19:03 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
That is the funniest post on this thread in months.

Thanks!

"Had Al Gore been elected....word was...regardless of Senate approval...that takes guts..."

You crack me up.

I would suggest you look for a job writing creative fiction. In your first article, you could put something in about how the discussion has moved from Slick lying under oath to...uh...rumors...about what Al might have done maybe sorta you think...if he had been elected, and how the...rumor...actually makes some sort of sense, or has some sort of journalistic merit or value of some kind.

Elvis and Bigfoot say hi. Kenneth says the frequency is 1330.

Out.



To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/25/2001 7:50:46 PM
From: Ben Wa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
It seems that infinite wisdom has much to give to those less fortunate. Regarding said Kyoto Treaty...(you can tell the leaders of the world that this factual information comes straight from none other than Ben Wa who has seen the future)..Let us say that implimentation of the Kyoto Treaty costs...mmmmm around $400 billion present value dollars. As we know, one theory is that CO2 levels have risen due to the burning of fossil fuels. It seems that the creators of the Kyoto Accord were not aware of the "Hubbard Curve", which when combined with knowledge about fossil fuel deposits, discovery growth rates, and usage growth rates, can tell us when the oil including that which is not yet been tapped, plainly runs out. For your particular planet, that is roughly the year 2050. On my planet, we tend to look at enironmental issues in terms of extended time frames. In fact, we have observed your Kyoto effort and realize that like many fairy tails, the story sounds charming. Centuries ago though, my home world experienced a situation similar to your earth. Our choice was to spend a quarter of our money trying to make our fossil fuel technology cleaner, but then we realized that by the time we perfected our systems, there would not be any fossil fuels left to try it out on! It was then that we realized how silly we all were. Instead, we spent a tiny fraction of the money that our politicians wanted us to spend on cleaner ways to burn dead things(we have politicians too)on creating controlled fusion reactors (150 earth years ago), biomass matter/energy conversion, solar power, and additional non-fossil based systems.
We are watching your planet carefully. In fact, groups of us are betting when the next war over fossil fuels will begin. Silly primates you are.



To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/25/2001 9:17:21 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Think of the unbelievable lack of leader ship that reveals - both from Clinton and Gore. How could they have let such an embarrassing vote even take place? My gosh, this was Gore's SIGNATURE issue and his own party, to a man, spit in his face.



To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/25/2001 9:52:12 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
<<word was that he intended to push the treaty through regardless of the Senate disapproval>>

So like his predecessor, he was planning to flush his oath of office down the sewer without even a second thought. The American public rejected Al Gore in November, 2000. They had good reason...



To: ColtonGang who wrote (164516)7/29/2001 7:36:40 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Your meds are wearing off. I prescribe lithium. Be very careful of the dosage. Well, no, forget that, you need A LOT.

Pray tell, HOW did Al Bore plan on pushing "the treaty through regardless of the Senate disapproval"?

Was he going to beg them?
Try to shame them?
Threaten to veto all their bills?
Threaten to campaign against all of them?

Have troops invade the Senate chamber with orders to shoot any Senator who voted against the bill?
What if the JCS refused to issue the order? Their oath is to the Constitution, not to Al Gore.

I eagerly await your boneheaded response.