SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (140123)7/26/2001 3:20:59 AM
From: Saturn V  Respond to of 186894
 
Ref < Intel will have to drive this by decreasing the die size of ITanium - 3'rd and 4'th generation off-shoots - and selling them with support circuits/motherboards for "reasonable" prices >

The cost of Itanium is surely headed downward. I believe McKinley has an integrated cache a la Coppermine. Thus the expensive cartridge will be history. Process shrinks will in due time reduce the silicon cost as well. Thus the cost differential between the IA-64 and IA-32 will drop.

The lower cost will give Intel greater flexibility in pricing and positioning the IA-64. The key issue will be what new unique 64bit mass applications become viable if the pricing differential between the IA-32 and IA-64 drops ?



To: Paul Engel who wrote (140123)7/26/2001 5:39:58 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hi Paul, RE: "Do you think that is Intel's intention?"

I doubt Microsoft would put the resources behind IA64 unless this was Intel's strategic intention.

Regards,
Amy J



To: Paul Engel who wrote (140123)7/26/2001 9:41:48 AM
From: dale_laroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
>Do you think that is Intel's intention?<

Intel has stated their intention to move Itanium onto the desktop in 2007.