Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alomex who wrote (164720)	7/26/2001 12:00:40 PM
From: J.B.C.	Respond to of 769670

Umm, the facts that I presented did not support the findings or were the result of scientific belief. They were either political conclusions or gynecologist posing as scientist. In either case, scientific fact is being ignored for the sake of environmental scare tactics. Jim

To: Alomex who wrote (164720)	7/26/2001 1:22:06 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 769670

The problem is that the most dire predictions get the most print. Don't discount the press role in this.

To: Alomex who wrote (164720)	7/26/2001 2:01:12 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I have spent many years of my career as an engineer in the science of measurement. I've read your dialog. I have a page watman.com This has many links to info on CO2 This is my Summary at SI Message 16119971 In this message I also point to The big discrepancy. Message 16117788 This summarizes The big discrepancy. that is detailed greeningearthsociety.org If you have data that contradicts this let me know. I'm not sure I understand what ring that accompanies most key scientific insights is in CO2. tom watson tosiwmee