SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : CONDIT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diana who wrote (986)7/26/2001 4:04:33 PM
From: Gary Gwynn  Respond to of 1669
 
If she didit then a Condit still conditit'ed it...



To: Diana who wrote (986)7/26/2001 5:16:37 PM
From: CVJ  Respond to of 1669
 
It looks there may be three possible scenarios for spousal testimony/non-testimony:

(1) One spouse is forbidden to testify for or against the other spouse under any circumstance;

(2) One spouse cannot be compelled to testify for or against the other spouse for any reason whatsoever;

(3) One spouse may be compelled to testify for or against the other spouse with consent of the other spouse;

If we assume a murder case, are there any attorneys out there willing to verify one of the above, or provide the correct scenario? TIA.

Chas



To: Diana who wrote (986)7/27/2001 10:47:55 AM
From: John Lacelle  Respond to of 1669
 
Thats very true. A spouse cannot be forced to testify. But the police want
to polygraph Carolyne Condit over this...it appears that Chandra Levy called
Condit's wife a few days before she disappeared. The polygraph would be
inadmissable evidence but could lend some light on what happened to the
Intern.

-John


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News