SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Range Bound & Undervalued Quality Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BWAC who wrote (4659)7/26/2001 7:27:07 PM
From: stomper  Respond to of 5499
 
But I think, If I decoded right, the report said 'Buy Ovaltine', No wait that was Ralphie's decoder in The Christmas Story.

LOL.

-dave



To: BWAC who wrote (4659)7/27/2001 8:04:10 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 5499
 
AES Reports - Message 16135283



To: BWAC who wrote (4659)8/1/2001 8:33:49 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 5499
 
The Fed Versus The Business Cycle
internetstockreport.com
July 31, 2001 - Morgan Stanley economist Stephen Roach's insightful
testimony to the Senate Banking Committee last week about the relationship
of the current economic downturn to the 1998 global downturn struck a
chord with us.

Structurally, there are patterns in a couple of major stock indexes - most
notably the S&P 500 and the Philadelphia Bank Index - that seem to support
Roach's observation.

The S&P 500 is forming an almost perfect rounding top off the October 1998
lows, and turned back at the boundary of that pattern at 1209 yesterday.
The index has at most another month before it will have to break down or
out of that pattern. A move above 1225 would be a positive, because it
would clear the tightest rendering of that pattern and set a higher high
for the index.

But it is the banking index that is the most interesting pattern. The BKX
appears to be forming a huge rising wedge off the October 1998 lows (see
chart below). A rising wedge is bearish because it implies a weak rally -
and projects an eventual complete retracement of the ground gained within
the pattern, if not more than that. That pattern is a long way from
breaking down, but we have to wonder if it doesn't imply some sort of
structural problem within the banking system - perhaps just too much debt
or bad credit created in the Fed liquidity pumping of 1998-1999 - that
could make for a harder than expected landing for the economy.

April 1998 was an important top for the NYSE advance-decline line, meaning
that most stocks put in important tops then.

Which leads us to the bigger question: Is there some natural business
cycle slowdown that has been trying to occur since 1998 that the Federal
Reserve is trying to forestall with rate cuts and liquidity injections?
According to some, the answer is yes.

First, some have the Kondratieff business cycle at or near the end of a
long period of deflationary growth, which could make the next period one
of depression. While we first mentioned the risk of deflation several
months ago, we would take the view at this point that the risk of
inflation is probably equal. Why? Because Federal Reserve liquidity
injections continue at record levels, including a whopping $32 billion
last week. It is almost as if the Fed wants to spark inflation. The
troubling aspect of last week's pumping is that it had little effect on
the stock market, unlike the Y2K liquidity injections of late 1999.

In a recent article in Barron's, P.Q. Wall wrote that the Dow may have
already peaked under the basic Kitchin cycle, but also said that the index
could surprise and go on to new highs in the September-January timeframe.
And Chris Carolan, whose Spiral Calendar predicts market turns years in
advance, has December 14 as the final bull market high. Carolan's cycle
could easily invert and become a low, however, as it did when he called a
major top in October 1998.

And finally, we would be remiss if we did not say here that most market
technicians seem to be leaning toward a surprising rally coming in the
stock market soon, based largely on the appearance of a bullish falling
wedge in the Nasdaq indexes (see Nasdaq 100 chart below). That pattern
could carry the Nasdaq to the 2300-2600 level.

That rally is definitely possible. However, it would have to come without
the commercial traders, who remain short this market, a big warning sign
that the smart money is not behind this market. And Microsoft is breaking
down out of a bearish rising wedge, which makes any Nasdaq rally scenario
difficult. Microsoft could negate that pattern with a strong upside break,
but a strong move down for Microsoft in the near future is more likely.
And finally, we continue to believe that the August 6-9 period is crucial
for this market, due to the convergence of several important cycles.
Whichever way the market turns in that timeframe could be the trend for
two months or more. If the bulls are going to surprise, that would be the
window for them to do it in, but it is also a period of high risk for the
market.



To: BWAC who wrote (4659)8/6/2001 10:10:50 AM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5499
 
Anyone follow MBI?