SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Windsock who wrote (49191)7/27/2001 11:28:49 AM
From: combjellyRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
"The one big requirement of Dell is that they want to "ship and forget""

Hasn't seemed to have worked for them. In our office, we have 5 Dell machines, 3 of which have failed in the past 6 months. Motherboard problems. All are 866MHz Optiplex GX200s, and the leases started from October through December of last year. Based on this, they have a whole lot of unreliable, Intel based machines in the field...

Isn't that motherboard one that is made for them by Intel?



To: Windsock who wrote (49191)7/28/2001 10:36:07 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Windsock: Using AMD results in unreliable systems.

Your constant whining on this subject matter is getting rather tiresome. You have exactly zero proof to back it up and, in fact, a solid case can be made for the exact opposite. (We can start off with Intel's most recent string of recalls and half-recalls, add to that Paul's favorite - the Via Southbridge, that doesn't work properly in either AMD or Intel systems - and Dan/Niceguy's (sorry, can't tell them apart) favorite - the ever-present i850 (thanks for the correction Win Smith) flat out incompatibility with non-bus mastering PCI devices).

From personal experience: We use quite a few AMD and Intel systems for servers where I work. All are extremely taxed and run a fairly wide variety of tasks. Which CPU powers the system doesn't appear to be a factor in the risk of down-time. Actually, I'd have to say that our dual-P2 system is probably the most crash-prone, but I have little reason to suspect the hardware. (We don't have any P4s, so the added instability of that platform over P3 is not something we have to worry about).

-fyo