SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Moguls Mantra to the Markets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: $Mogul who wrote (130)7/27/2001 3:59:08 PM
From: $Mogul  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 220
 
It's been a consolidative week for the bond futures contract, even with major quarterly economic releases and an appearance by Alan Greenspan. On the one hand, continued weak economic data and the elusiveness of the rebound kept bond futures from moving through support at 102 24/32 on both Wednesday and Thursday. But many in the market continue to look toward an economic recovery and expect future Fed rate cuts to be limited, preventing the bond contract from moving above 103 30/32 as the 104 level looms. A move above 104 in the bond contract would represent a 61.8% retracement of the sell-off from March 22 to May 15, suggesting a reversal of that downtrend that market doesn't seem prepared to concede yet. The result was a range of just 1 6/32 for the week, the tightest weekly range since February and a little more than half the average weekly range seen so far this year. That came despite Greenspan's testimony, which held no surprises, and the quarterly GDP and ECI reports, which were also generally in line with expectations. The biggest question the market is facing is how the tax rebates will impact the economy. Any clear sign of a boost to spending could push Treasuries lower, but that likely won't be known for some time yet as the government just began mailing out rebates last week. Nearer-term, factors that might break the bond out of its range include a sharp move in stocks, an Argentine default, a surge in oil prices or a sharp drop in next week's NAPM index. Another possibility: a defeat of Japan's LDP in Sunday's election, leading to a sharp drop in the Nikkei.

Cash levels on Treasuries at the 3 p.m. futures close: 30-year 97 16+/32 5.547%; 10-year 99 07+/32 5.102%; 5-year 100 036/32 4596%; 2-year 100 002/32 3.871%. The yield spread between FNMA 10-year notes and U.S. 10-year notes is at 73 basis points, unchanged from yesterday.

Money supply growth accerated last week, as most forecasters had anticipated, with M3 expanding $26.4 billion. Money supply data continues to suggest that liquidity is plentiful. M3, for example, the Fed's broad measure of money supply growth, has gained at an annualized rate of 12.7% so far this year. This rate is extraordinary as is the year-over-year gain of 11.3%, a nearly 20-year high. While there's no doubt that the surge in money growth can be partly attributable to a shift in assets from equities to zero maturity assets such as money market funds, the increase is also the result of credit expansion, as evidenced by the robust level of corporate bond issuance so far this year; bond issuance is running close to double last year's record pace. While the data also hints at conservative attitudes that might not easily be changed, the flipside is that investors have ample cash to plough into the equity market if they become so emboldened. Investors might be encouraged to shift this liquidity back to stocks if the economy shows true signs of stabilizing. The shift to money market funds could be last longer than usual, given the severe and painful drubbing that investors took in 2000. Investors are clearly now more interested in the return of capital instead of the return on capital now that the financial bubble has burst. This has been the case in the Japan for 10 years and is a reminder of just how long lasting painful memories of stock losses can be. If investors do indeed stay away from stocks and therefore invest less in the economy, economic weakness will surely be the result. In turn, the Fed will have to cut rates still-more aggressively in order to battle the classic elements of a liquidity trap--the so-called pushing-on-a-string dilemma that occurs when cutting interest rates produces no response in the economy. But the gains in the money supply also suggest sufficient liquidity exists for a recovery in the economy.