SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (140327)7/27/2001 10:38:43 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
I look for AMD to require a Chrysler type bailout from somebody by a year from now. Maybe Intel will save their sorry a** again.



To: Dan3 who wrote (140327)7/28/2001 12:53:33 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Blowing it up your Nose Dan - Re: "An installed base of 50 million X86-64 systems by 2003."

What a joke !!!

What a joke from a complete fool !!!

AMD may not even get their FIRST Hamster out until 2003 !!



To: Dan3 who wrote (140327)7/28/2001 1:34:47 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan, <An installed base of 50 million X86-64 systems by 2003.>

That's a good one. AMD can't even make over 8 or 9 million processors per quarter right now, and you expect AMD to ramp-up Hammer from a late 2002 release to an average of 12M every quarter in 2003.

At least NiceGuy snapped out of his fantasy. Why can't you?

Tenchusatsu



To: Dan3 who wrote (140327)7/28/2001 1:19:03 PM
From: greg s  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan, re: An installed base of 50 million X86-64 systems by 2003.

You are delusional. Get a grip. I hope both AMD and Intel do well, but this is absolutely absurd.

Argue your points with statements within the realm of probability, else risk everyone discounting every word you say.

greg