SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (114833)7/29/2001 10:20:29 AM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Saw that too. This one's actually pretty easy to understand; they even give a pretty good idea of the reason in the article. They asked investors if they thought they would meet their investment goals in the next twelve months. Well, since they were expecting 20% annual returns forever, and they now see they aren't going to get that, they are "pessimistic".

Are they still at record overweight equity ownership levels? Yep.

The only reliable sentiment numbers appear to be those by Investor's Intelligence. Even the AAII numbers are suspect. The way that they ask the questions somehow allows for total inversions of "investor sentiment" in the space of five days, which obviously means the numbers have little significance.

You want to gauge more than how the investing public "feels" on any given day; you are interested in what they are doing with their money. When individual investors finally start throwing in the towel, and insiders start to belly up to the bar, that's when I'll become interested in equities again.

BC



To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (114833)8/3/2001 3:34:40 PM
From: pater tenebrarum  Respond to of 436258
 
sounds like a good strategy to me...and i agree with your comment on the polls...generally very unreliable.



To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (114833)8/3/2001 5:36:05 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Respond to of 436258
 
re: investor sentiment polls:

I agree, that they are unreliable. I follow flows into stock mutual funds. This measures what individual investors are actually doing, as opposed to what they are saying. Those flows went negative earlier this year (usually a sign of a bottom), and are now modestly up, but still a long, long way from where they were at the Bubble peak.

I, too, am not doing much at the moment. I'll add some long positions if the Nas retests it's lows (1600). I'll sell more into strength. The SOX has almost made a 50% move off it's prior low, and that is a sell signal (assuming you think it's just a bear rally).