SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pheilman_ who wrote (76298)7/28/2001 6:56:14 PM
From: The Prophet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Like many, including Judge Payne, I'm afraid you do not understand the rules of the patent process. It is permissible, and common, to amend existing patent applications to cover products from competitors made known to you during the pendency of the patent and which you believe are covered by your initial specification.

You may not understand the reasoning, but it is the law.



To: pheilman_ who wrote (76298)7/29/2001 5:55:31 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
You may have a patent but you do not seem to have much knowledge of royalty rates on patents. You seem to be extending your limited experience with patents to the issue of royalties where you apparently have no experience.

Opinions are like assholes everyone has one.

:)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News