SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (129351)7/30/2001 8:04:45 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
SB: Lets untangle some of the things you are rolling up in a ball. If my car goes 20 miles to the gallon and I buy a new one that gets 30 miles to the gallon, the new car is more efficient. Now, knowing that, how many miles will I drive? You cannot say. The miles I get to a gallon gives you no way to predict how many miles I will drive. These are separate issues. But if I have a gas budget of $1,000, I can now drive farther with my new car than I could with my old car -- that is a fact. Productivity growth is NOT the same thing as GDP growth. One measures efficiency and the other measures output. You might use GDP in calculating productivity, just as you might use the number of miles I drive and the gas I have used to see what kind of mileage I am getting. But you cannot predict how many miles I will drive simply by knowing how many miles to the gallon my car will go -- it is that simple.



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (129351)7/30/2001 10:17:49 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
SB, why don't you call Boeing (BA) if you want to talk about 'productivity' gains.
>Boeing did even better. It reduced those costs by 50 percent, Brower said.
seattlep-i.nwsource.com