Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skywatcher who wrote (166365)	7/31/2001 11:30:26 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Those who are technically challenged simple do not comprehend the concept of coarse control and fine control. SO you post the words of another techno illiterate who invents an analysis to fit his misconceptions. You are free to believe what you wish but condemned to never know what is really true. I can point to real engineering that I have authored. Joe who??? You have read my long term consistent debunk of the Texas energy gouge lie and now that data is out that says I was correct all along. You ask "Why has the media mostly ignored the story?" The facts of the test were all made public and all the technical literate knew what I have said about coarse and fine control and when asked by the ignorant media the were told. Only the rabid report beyond reality for the consumption of the rabid. The Davis sham is ignored because all the newsies were snookered and won't admit they screwed up. But in general they won't report falsely unless snookered. The DOD completely disclosed the test and a Court Order was required to get the Davis energy data to expose his lies. Sorry, but the truth does not fit your agenda. tom watson tosiwmee

To: Skywatcher who wrote (166365)	7/31/2001 11:54:12 AM
From: H-Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Because it is a standard testing protocol, that was well known and by no means a hidden fact as the author claims. The beacon makes up for the fact that the radar systems we have in place today are insufficient and were too close to the launch site to be used in the test. Additionally the GPS beacon only provides Gross Point Targeting, the 'hit to kill' missile's systems aquired the target and destroyed it on its own. hardly rigged as your o so objective author suggests Meanwhile, about two weeks ago the Russians have tested a long range missile, which is believed to be designed to avoid detection of existing systems. This missile was designed and developed, long before GWB talk of a missile defence shield. So the claim that a missile defence shield will cause a new missile race / escalation cant be true, since this is just one of the many numerous examples proving that the race is already on, and has been for some time. wake up.