Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Winter in the Great White North -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: david who wrote (1201)	7/31/2001 4:48:01 PM
From: LeonardSlye	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8273

David, the most confusing part of one of your posts Message 16138639 is that it was the same generic one you put over on the DDE page just 3 minutes later Message 16138644 ...which is why mine was precycled to me. It didn’t seem to find any better continuity over there. Just think, I actually tried to answer it LOL. You appear to be very Spartan in speaking of financial statements. What I would need to convince me—although I have no interest in the stock and therefore no intention of doing one—is a thorough fundamental analysis. Outstanding results from a fundamental analysis may help to offset the dreary TA picture. All IMHO, of course. David, all the best with this stock; good news today on a PP brought it up. It could be a winner or it could be a loser, either way it doesn't matter to me. But, it is not my intention to promulgate what appears to me to be a DDE soapbox appearing on this very worthwhile thread. Happy Trails, Lenny

To: david who wrote (1201)	7/31/2001 5:42:39 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8273

Dave, i think one thing that stimulated Lenny's ire was your wording in the stockhouse post he quoted, where you appear to say that you 'found' the stockwatch post - 'have seen a post on stock-watch. and I am Pasting it' - stockhouse.ca ... this he has construed as deception, and i can't think of another way to interpret it myself, actually ... also, he has noticed that you mention only one stock ... people that go on and on about a single stock get quickly discounted on the net ... an example - there's a maritimer by the login of Osprey who made a practice of talking up oel.v quite frequently for an extended period of time, and very little else if any, well all he gained from that was a loss of credibility, imho - both for himself and for the stock ..... in neither case, oel.v or dde.v, do i think the stock is a scammy PoS, but it does seem to me possible to make them appear as such with an overly hypey approach .... most of us here have long histories over many many stocks, we know each other's history to varying extent, and we like to hear both sides of the story, pros and cons ... and lots of cold hard numbers, always - cash on hand, cash burn, realistic prospects for revenue trend, etc Btw, you two - i know both of you from other venues, and consider you both friends ... if you're going to fight, please be witty, make it a good read ... and david, by all means en castellano -g ... cháu