Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (49518)	7/31/2001 9:39:36 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 275872

John remember that Paul was an intel exec at one point and the definition of "illegal" is something that you can not hide for him. Regards -Albert

To: Petz who wrote (49518)	8/1/2001 12:26:11 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 275872

RE:"offer P4's do DELL for $100 ONLY IF they cancelled an AMD order -- is ILLEGAL, does it?" Where did you hear that? LOL

To: Petz who wrote (49518)	8/1/2001 3:13:02 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Re: " It doesn't seem to bother you that what Intel did -- offer P4's do DELL for $100 ONLY IF they cancelled an AMD order -- is ILLEGAL, does it?" Intel didn't offer to sell P4's to Dell for $100 if they canceled an AMD order. First, that assumes AMD already had an order from DELL. Do you think Mad Man Sanders would let one half of a pico-second go buy without issuing a PRESS RELEASE that DELL had just ordered CPUs from AMD? Exactly - Crack Pot Sanders would be on CNBC telling the world what a hero he was to get this order. Ergo - THERE WAS NO ORDER - pure and simple. Do you also believe that Intel was responsible for bribing the Chicago White Sox to throw the 1919 World Series?