Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Windsock who wrote (138434)	8/1/2001 3:16:18 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583503

pale in comparison, don't you think? I'm not debating the seriousness of the crimes; rather, I'm considering the entire picture. In Clinton's case, you've got the leader of the free world sexually assaulting women, which clearly had horrible consequences for the nation as a whole. Do I care about the BJ? Of course not. But the guy raped one other woman, made unwanted advances toward others, abused his power against a near-teenager, and sexually harrassed one other (Ms. Jones). This, from the guy in charge. It is not okay. Only a very stupid person would suggest that these criminal behaviors from the President should be tolerated. He should have been impeached, if not for the acts, if for the two years of disruption it caused the nation. It is what happens when you get a guy with no scruples as president. The only good news is that, because of his actions, we will be remembered as the absolute worst president of these times. There simply is not one single accomplishment of significance during the Clinton years that can be attributed to his leadership. This mayor has nothing to do with anything. His involvement has no more political signficiance that if he was just a guy on the street. And for you to see it as having some political significance is reflective of a kind of shallowness of thought I simply cannot identify with.