SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: asenna1 who wrote (166689)8/1/2001 3:25:46 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
So what? Who advocates that it should be? Not I. JLA



To: asenna1 who wrote (166689)8/1/2001 4:16:52 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
It will hopefully always only be the Untied States of America.

It was bizarre that in your post you italicized Untied (sic) and not States. Was it a Freudian slip? Are you really an anarchist or worse.......a right wing radical secessionist?



To: asenna1 who wrote (166689)8/1/2001 4:18:29 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Luckily, your answers are about as dopey as your normal posts.

In these here UNTIED States....



To: asenna1 who wrote (166689)8/1/2001 7:38:02 PM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Did anyone suggest it was a "Christian Nation"? I thought it was a stupid question because it was obviously a no answer. Wondered what prompted it to begin with. The other answers to your question seemed pretty logical, but you belittled their answers and repeated the question.

Maybe I didn't go back in the posts far enough.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News