Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Anatolia Minerals Development Ltd V.YMC.U -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (245)	8/2/2001 10:50:38 AM
From: russwinter	Respond to of 468

Hole 8 was a stepout (and we don't expect all stepouts to pull one ounce/t do we?) to the northwest, and at least shows there's gold there. And 9 was even further away and lost (YMC suggests deeper?)the body. I say so what, as the important action will be around the glory hole and towards the main zone. If we see a falloff there from the 2.5 g and no more high grade, we may have a bit of a problem, but this doesn't really suggest that will happen (10 was a great confirming hole with the 1.8% copper bonus)? <Ends up below RTP's threshold, will drop project> Still an unknown, but very promising, but I say let them drop it, and place the full deposit and the free work back in YMC's hands. With the dearth of new deposits of this quality, somebody will go after it.

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (245)	8/2/2001 3:12:53 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 468

<For example, Hole CRC8A assayed 1.4 grams over 32 meters,> True... but it was a stepout. some 300m to the NW. < Hole CRC9 assayed 0.1 grams per tn and the interval wasn't mentioned,> Ture... but it was a step out some 650 meters to the west of the main zone. < Hole CRC 10 cut three intervals all of which are uneconomic > 28 meters of 2.2 grams at 33 meters from surface may not be uneconomic..that is a strop ratio slightly above 1 assuming true width. All will depend on the sort of continuity between this one and hole CDD001 and CRC001..In other words it is too early to say. <same as CRC7.> I agree on this one. Disapointing. The program is early..time will tell. BTW, RDU had some good numbers... lower grade, but very nice intercepts. A promising situation.