Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (9894)	8/3/2001 5:07:47 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

The decision was sound on the grounds of Equal Protection. Article II and the federal statute as applied to the facts of this case. That's my argument. We disagree...... JLA BTW this argument:Alright, the Supreme Court sacrificed its principles and accepted a bunch of crappy arguments that they would not have accepted at any other time, but the circumstances justified it ....always fractures me. For some reason its OK to "sacrifice" for demolib causes like abortion but not for anything conservatives might favor. Not that that happened in Bush v. Gore but there certainly is precedent for your version of facts and I don't hear any liberal indignation over Roe v Wade.....