Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (49841)	8/3/2001 7:47:42 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Paul let's gorilla waste the money developing new standards for 10 years from now while amd will be using ht NOW :-)) I hoped that would do something like that but was afraid that Jerry's pride would stand in a way. Intel ended up as a fool here Regards -Mad Albert

To: Paul Engel who wrote (49841)	8/4/2001 12:15:08 PM
From: fyodor_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Paul: AMD recognized the superiority of the Intel approach. Lol, you are so funny. There was no competing approach. The media (and you) had tried to make it appear like HyperTransport is competing in the same segment as 3GIO. It isn't. It never was. There's a big difference, from an electrical point of view, between a chip-to-chip interconnect and a chip-to-"card" interconnect. If you can't see the difference, I'm sorry. The only technology that competed for the "PCI 3.0" slot with Intel's 3GIO was PCI-X. And, frankly, PCI-X isn't much to get excited about. -fyo