SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Philosopher who wrote (20577)8/4/2001 7:05:18 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
This may not be it, but if it is, they are right to resist.

If they were all government employees, this is a non-issue. Of course, once an accusation is made, I don't know how you prove it's not true other than by producing enough information to demonstrate who was there. Without the disclosure, people will assume the worst, which is that there were others there, or the second worst, which is that Cheney is letting his pique override the interests of his Administration.

Karen



To: The Philosopher who wrote (20577)8/4/2001 9:51:07 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
There has, I believe, to be some area of activity within which the executive branch can discuss things in private

Absolutely agree.

And you know that even if those conversations with the big bad oil execs were about the weather... you can expect the Dem "leadership" with the assistance of the liberally biased media to report them as some sort of evil conspiracy. Facts don't matter to such folks. And the fact is there should be some privacy afforded such consultations. That said I still believe Cheney should have expected the way this would be played out and turned the records over acknowledging the Bush Administration was making a special accomodation to GAO. it would also have drawn a nice distinction from the criminal enterprise previously known as the Clinton Administration....

JLA