Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (167627)	8/4/2001 12:58:04 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Those are the only christians i will argue with and i actually convinced one his form of exclusionary religion was was an arrogant conceit and was in truth anti-christian. I posted the scriptures. If you consider them anti-Christian, you are even more blind than I first thought. Or just a good deceiver. Either way, you convince me of nothing.

To: LTK007 who wrote (167627)	8/5/2001 11:44:33 PM
From: cAPSLOCK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

and i actually convinced one his form of exclusionary religion was was an arrogant conceit and was in truth anti-christian. I see at least two interesting paradoxes in this statement. First of all isn't a bit weird to insist to be exclusionary is wrong? I understand the sentiment, but it is a snake eating it's tail. There is only one truth. You believe this whether you admit it or not. You consider the statement "There is more than one Truth (or way, God, path, and so on)" to be TRUE. This is a logical contradiction. Also to determine (as a non christian) for a Christian what is 'anti-christian' is ... well to use your words: arrogant conceit in my opinion. But far be it for me to tell you what to believe... Hmm... or not? You can't have both, really. cAPS