SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: asenna1 who wrote (167662)8/4/2001 12:57:25 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
The complete and immediate privatization of Social Security would serve to eliminate the MYTH that it is somehow different from any other public spending program. To the extent that it runs a surplus, that is no different from any other description of a government surplus. To the extent that it attains eventual collapse, as any Ponzi scheme is doomed to do, it is no different than any other national bankruptcy. The politicians who pump the fraud of Social Security as some sort of "savings plan" that has assets and profits like a private investment are mostly (but not all) Democrat/Socialists. Move them out of the Congress, and the restructuring of Social Security out of public-sector control can proceed BEFORE the catastrophe of bankruptcy brings it about in spite of future politicians' fraudulent representations. Leave it the way it is, and the disaster will be of biblical proportions...



To: asenna1 who wrote (167662)8/4/2001 2:22:49 PM
From: alan w  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
Exactly the point back when the Dems were saying the Republican Congress was trying to "starve old ladies and children". They were claiming the Repub's were "cutting" the budget when in reality they were trying to slow the rate of increases.

Finally see the light huh? Congratulations.

alan w



To: asenna1 who wrote (167662)8/4/2001 5:03:18 PM
From: H-Man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
but was merely after a cut in the rate of increase

Exactly what the GOP was doing in 95, and the howls from the democrats were endless.