SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (49901)8/4/2001 5:39:25 PM
From: combjellyRespond to of 275872
 
"Uh..that was about ONE year ago - but you were never one for sticking to the facts when you could make a better story by "making up" the facts !!"

And, of course, they didn't start working on their copper process until that day. Which is why it was such a surprise when the Tbird was introduced. And all that talk about test runs of copper SRAMs and K6-2s in 1999 was just fantasy...



To: Paul Engel who wrote (49901)8/4/2001 10:28:58 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: Uh..that was about ONE year ago

So, you think Intel is only one year behind AMD, and not the 1 1/2 years behind that I posted?

Don't forget that AMD converts its FAB lines more quickly than Intel can (partly, I admit, because there are so many more Intel lines to convert).

Overall, I think that AMD is closer to 1.5 years ahead of Intel than the 1 year you believe, but I'm sure you'll cling to your conclusion regardless of what I post.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News