SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Steve's Channelling Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (23018)8/6/2001 8:30:32 AM
From: Paul A  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Nice way to start my week off with some reality checks for Intel..

an entire week of positive comments and analyst upgrades, and Intel has trouble breaking over 32.. One negative and it is immediately back to the support at $30..

This is one reason I do not listen to Larrys yapping about short sellers losing it all in the end.. Selloffs tend to be alot more severe and thus profitable for the shorter who follows the rules, allocates thru the volatility and covers and steps aside when it goes wrong.

Probably going to take the gift on Intel and cover for a small profit here.. Have plenty of other tech stocks that IM short, and need to loosen up a bit. Will reshort Intel when/if it becomes clear we are going below 2000 but I still dont trust this market..

MU should hopefully shed another point today making this a very wonderful day indeed..



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (23018)8/6/2001 8:35:33 AM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30051
 
Sorry about the missing "n", the spell checker must recognize "ot" as a "fair word". (g). What is that "ot" anyway?

I for one was able to see the missing "n." How people could read that sentence and think you changed your position is beyond me.