To: Poet who wrote (1594 ) 8/6/2001 10:25:47 AM From: Neocon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1857 Actually, the fascination with the Boomers is only somewhat a matter of narcissism. I think it is difficult for us to imaging how the world has changed since the Revolution. The pace of economic, technological, and social change in the last 200 hundred years has been astounding, and created a world unlike any that had come before. But the watershed, in a lot of ways, was the post- War period, at least for the developed world. Suddenly, there was broad- based affluence, remarkable social freedom, and the opportunity to have such a thing as a teen culture. This was not the only important thing to occur, but it was in itself remarkable, and became intertwined with much else that was novel in the latter part of the century. (Tom Wolfe, incidentally, is particularly good on these questions). For example, although the Civil Rights struggle was largely grounded in the Churches, the leadership was remarkably young (Martin Luther King Jr. was not yet thirty at the time of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, and the others in the SCLC, like Ralph Abernathy, were often younger). Youngsters initiated the sit- in movement. Youngsters were at the front of the line when the hoses were turned on, not because there were none older, but because they were protective of their mothers and grandfathers. The Freedom Riders, and those who did the field work for voting rights, were mainly college students, graduate students, and young instructors. Then came the Vietnam War, and the sense of a mass movement being formed from youth disaffection was increased. It was always exaggerated (most of the 18 year olds who voted in 68 voted for Nixon), but it created a heady sense of change. It was in just such ways that the rise of the youth culture seemed inextricably linked with other large changes in the culture, even though, for example, the War on Poverty was a technocratic off- shoot of the New Deal current in American politics..........