Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (1828)	8/6/2001 12:01:47 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Janice, you don't think the SEC might have been the ones racking up $233K of charges on Mikey's AMEX card do you? If one wants to find fault with the SEC, why, after nailing him on securities fraud, do they still let this lunatic still run a publicly traded company?! - Jeff

To: Janice Shell who wrote (1828)	8/6/2001 1:06:58 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

Maybe that's from Mikey's car? And I just love that "prima fascia" evidence... Isn't Sylver ignoring the fact that ANTD is the TA, and responsible for issuing the certs? ? Is he going to ask for criminal charges against ANTD and himself? Wait a minute....make that MORE criminal charges. We believe that this length of time constitute a CRIMINAL action rather then a civil action one on the part of Brokerage Firms and complicity on the part of the SEC, who is not enforcing the Federal and Securities Law with equality. This is the first time in Stock Market History that a corporation has been able to show with absolute proof that illegal and fictitious shares are entering our OTC Markets and still The SEC will not investigate nor enforce the Buy-In Rule which would ultimately expose the Firms responsible for selling stock without the ability to deliver certificates. pub28.bravenet.com

To: Janice Shell who wrote (1828)	8/6/2001 1:12:30 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12465

The Crusher's letter to NASD reveals his "reasoning", such as it is... Mr. Robert R. Glauber, CEO and President NASD Inc. 1735 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Dear Mr. Glauber: We are in receipt of your email message dated June 29, 2001 sent at 6:31 a.m. addressed to Mr. Jack Moore (copy enclosed). We would like to refer you to the third paragraph of the message, where you state: As issues surrounding stock certificates (in your case, Amazon Natural Treasures.com) are handled by transfer agents, you will need to seek assistance from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Please be advised that although Amazon Natural Treasures.Com, Inc. is, in fact, self-transferring, Amazon is being effectively prevented from transferring stock (Cusip No. 02313 U101 (formerly Cusip No. 02313 P102)), to many of the beneficial owners such as those referred to in Mr. Moore?s complaint letter (copy enclosed)due to the continued failure on the part of many of the NASD member broker-dealer firms and registered representatives which are subject to your jurisdiction to comply with the regulations guaranteeing to the ?beneficial owners? the ?absolute right? to receive his or her physical certificate upon request. Please refer to:17 CFR 24015c 3-3(d)(2), CFR 240.15c 3-3(l)(1); and, Article 8 UCC 8-314 (2) (a)(b)(c).\........ pub28.bravenet.com