SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (168081)8/6/2001 5:14:31 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
In that case, the unequal treatment is the cause for the suit, not the existence of the voluntary affair. I have never heard of a case won on the basis that an office affair is per se injurious to other workers. Have you?



To: jlallen who wrote (168081)8/6/2001 7:39:39 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 769670
 
who do not receive the same favorable treatment a paramour may receive...
Ah, you might want to clarify just what "favorable treatment" means. :-)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News