Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Timetobuy who wrote (39877)	8/6/2001 9:55:45 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

"I didn't accuse anyone of anything. " So what exactly do you call these comments................ ...........""So is it fair to tout those gains as if they were a sure thing?.......................... ...........Why don't you want anyone to look at your math if this is a sure thing? Cheerleading is good! Rah! Rah! Pointing out it's not a sure thing is BAD! Nice to know you only want to hear one side................. "" ______________________________________________________________________________ It clearly seems you are accusing RR of, 'touting' "those" gains", which you later inappropriately allege RR touts as a "sure thing". Where is the touting you allege? Where did RR or anyone claim it was a sure thing???? Link & verbatim quotes please??? You continue with making the accusation about me, "don't you want anyone to look at your math", although this is completely false. Care to provide a link & verbatim quote in support of this accusation?? Next, you compound the situation by accusing me &/or RR of, "Cheerleading", the alleged touting this sure thing, which, BTW, is completely baseless (Got a link & quote?). Then you end the point with the accusation that it's, "Nice to know you only want to hear one side", which is also without any merit at all. Point us to where anyone said or implied such nonsense please. So what part of accusations don't you understand? "You're the one with the BS in math... " I don't have a BS in math. Never made any such claim. If you're calling my math in todays posts BS, well, I didn't really do any math. So what exactly is your point here? "I have made no accusations. I was taking the hypothesis a little further. What is wrong with that?" Yes you did. This is undeniable unless you wish to call Webster a liar or rewrite history. As for taking the hypothesis a little further, what's your point? I took issue with your baseless allegations. Why don't you address those instead of denying the undeniable?? "Why can't we have a calm discussion? You are protesting an awful lot." What is not calm about all of the factual information I have provided? My protests are due to my problem with people who are factually challenged & can outright deny the undeniable. "I NEVER said it wasn't possible. In fact, I said it WAS possible. " Yes you did say it was possible. You briefly mentioned it ONCE. Then you went on to make a number of baseless accusations & ridiculed the hypothesis with sarcasm & drew inaccurate conclusions while denying that any of this took place. That is precisely what I took issue with, no more, no less. "What the hell is wrong with that? " My sentiments exactly.