Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (50125)	8/6/2001 10:11:54 PM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (8) \| Respond to of 275872

<font color=red>SUSPENSIONS Well we are 50K post old, but unfortunately this thread seems to getting out of control. It is still better than how the old thread used to be, but not by much. The following folks are gone for two weeks. I do realize that Paul is up for his third and final suspension, but since I do not have time to take a vote I will just do a two week thingy. I will do a vote for permanent suspension if it comes to that. Win Smith for Message 16176458 for obvious reasons. Paul Engel for Message 16168937 Message 16169005 Message 16169896 For off topic, and personal attack. Paul needs to learn to stop being so mean spirited. He forgets that his points (and many of which are valid) gets lost in his poor tone. Mani

To: Win Smith who wrote (50125)	8/7/2001 8:56:12 AM
From: niceguy767	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Win: "Cory's too busy whoring for Intel to get the primary point, or any point at all." So it seems with many of Cory's ilk...Choosing to close their eyes to the alarming negative trend in INTC's financials over the past 2 years would be understandable if there were a glimmer of hope of a deceleration in this negative rate of decline going forward...but as mentioned yesterday, INTC's declining revenues, declining margins, depleted capital gains pool from which to pad earnings(to the tune of $3 billion in 2000), a $1 billion increase in GW in 2000 and a lame P4 to fend off AMD's relentless incursions into previously uncontested terrain just doesn't leave much room for additional "accounting flexibiolity" going forward...and P4 just isn't convincing in its attributes to provide faith in INTC prospects going forward, particularly if one buys into the notion that mobiles will replace the need for most desktops over the next 5 years, if not sooner...Last I heard, P4's aren't exactly mobile friendly!