Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Timetobuy who wrote (39880)	8/6/2001 10:36:30 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

"Sorry, I should have checked which one of you was attacking me at the moment." I have not attacked you. I have pointed out clear discrepancies, false accusations & allegations as well as inappropriate behavior on your part. There is a big difference in case you don't understand. "This is very typical of people who try to get others to follow them." Well, if you actually read what RR posts here, you would know that a comment like that is completely unnecessary and is not what RR is about in any way, shape, or form. It's become painfully obvious you haven't read RR's posts as well as the posts regarding this subject here today, or you never would have made such a harsh & baseless comparison. "It sure seemed to set off a nerve,............... " What set off the nerve were the clear discrepancies in your false and baseless accusations, your repeated denial of undeniable facts & your inappropriate behavior. ..........."like someone who had huge big losses in the past, but hey, that's not you. I know it ain't. Because you use stop losses, you limit your risk with only options that will rise and the market goes your way." This just proves beyond a shadow of a doubt you are a selective reader, or perhaps you are reading challenged in some way. I discussed my past with options as part of this potential 20% monthly QQQ option discussion today. Why do you insist on spouting off with strong accusations & bold claims when you cannot or will not even take the time to know the facts first? "I can see that it really made your blood pressure rise and I wouldn't want that to happen." Hmmmmmmm, he must be reading challenged as I've addressed this repeatedly today in our discussions with each other............. Well maybe he is just factually challenged............... or he just draws conclusions in the face of clearly contradictory evidence. Oh well, something isn't working right in his mind me thinks.