SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Timetobuy who wrote (39883)8/7/2001 12:01:18 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 65232
 
"IS MY MATH ANY DIFFERENT THAN RR'S?"

That is totally irrelevant to our discussion.

"Are you upset that I have the SAME hypothesis with the math worked out or are you now thinking that it's ridiculous? "</i?

Again your point is totally irrelevant to your baseless accusations, false assumptions, ridicule & personal attacks that have been clearly enumerated several different ways tonight.

"Wasn't his post meant to get everyone thinking about what the great results would be if the hypothesis turned out to be real?"

Apparently you still have not grasped reality as you continue to blithely ignore the baseless accusations you made about this hypothesis. If you had even bothered to read a few posts completely before you spouted off your totally baseless comments, you would have had no need to make the above statement.

", gee if this is right, it looks like some kind of ponzi scheme or pyramid trade and if it were so easy, why wouldn't everyone be doing this and if they were, wouldn't they be a huge trillionaire by now and why would they be posting on SI?"

Apparently you still have not grasped reality as you continue to blithely ignore the baseless accusations you made about this hypothesis. If you had even bothered to read a few posts completely before you spouted off your totally baseless comments, you would have had no need to make the above statement.

"MY POINT:................... "

It has absolutely nothing to do with that point. It is totally about the verbatim quotes that clearly establish you making baseless allegations, false assumptions, rude comments & personal attacks.

RE: Missy.............. First, it's obvious you did not use Missy as a pet name. Any reasonable person would know you meant it in a derogatory manner. You also made other derogatory comments referring to RR & myself as females. So not only did you malign Rick & myself, you intimated that calling someone a females in this manner means you look at women in a derogatory manner. Second, if you bothered to read my posts or RR's posts, you would know that Tim & Rick are male names. Oh & I referred to RR as he, him, etc a number of times tonight in posts to you so there is absolutely no excuse for your demeaning comments about women.

"Why are you so upset? "

What's wrong with your reading comprehension skills? I'm not upset in the least & have repeated this several times to you tonight........... or is there some other underlying problem that you have?