SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (168401)8/7/2001 11:36:15 AM
From: Zoltan!  Respond to of 769667
 
Just like a Liberal, you start out by calling names and then leave when facts defeat your fanciful Liberal illusions.

>>Don't have all day here but from time to time I'll drop in with my foolish thoughts

Comic relief, no doubt. Next time try being civil and the informed people may be kinder and gentler. We realize Libs are governed by emotion and more emotion so we expect the frustrated anger of your ignorance.



To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (168401)8/7/2001 11:36:23 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 769667
 
And you are so humble and lovable that you think you are wrong? Well, then we are in general agreement....You are the Weakest Link...Goodbye!........LOL!



To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (168401)8/7/2001 3:08:31 PM
From: Zoltan!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
More "arrogance" from the right directed at the wrong:

Add Roper to "arrogant":

Media liberalism shows itself in the voting records of the media. A Roper Center survey found that a mere 2 percent of all major-media bureau chiefs and political reporters based in Washington described themselves as conservative; moreover, 89 percent voted for Bill Clinton in 1992, compared to just 7 percent for George Bush. Compare that to the 43/38 percent split among the overall American public.
lib.uconn.edu

Looks like Michael Barone predicted the CNN dilemma of Liberal news, fewer views:

Michael Barone, writing in The American Enterprise stated:

Mainline journalism is by no means reliably pro-Democratic, as
Clinton White House staffers will attest, but it is reliably
anti-Republican. The Center for Media and Public Affairs
documented that in the fall 1994 campaigns the three major
networks gave Newt Gingrich 100 percent negative coverage. If
journalism's reputation for liberalism, combined with the
industry's drive for "multicultural" hiring, keeps driving away
conservatives and attracting liberals, there will soon be
problems. Problems with the quality and accuracy of news coverage,
and problems with audience rebellion. I will not be surprised if in
perhaps a dozen years the owners of our mass media may finally
have to take on the newsroom cultures to prevent the destruction of
otherwise exceedingly valuable financial assets. That would mean
installing tough, objective-minded editors. . . . And it would mean
taking affirmative actions to hire Republicans, conservative Christians, and others now vastly under-represented in newsrooms.

The American Enterprise (March/April 1996): 30.

Barone writes the definitive and exhaustive Almanac of American Politics
nationaljournal.com