SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel G. DeBusschere who wrote (60424)8/7/2001 6:40:00 PM
From: t2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
I posted previously that this would be a no brainer decision. For the life of me, I cannot figure out why the "experts" would ever doubt this course of action. As I stated this should be graduate business course 501. Now, my next no brainer is that the Court will find the lower court findings of law to be fatally defective because of the "documented" judicial bias by the lower court judge. There is absolutely no way the conservative majority of this court will let this stand. I am sorry for those of you who believe that MSFT is guilty as hell, but our judicial system still has some integrity as least at this level.

Excellent points. It appears that MSFT may be also using the Appeals Court's words about judge Jackson as a reason to go for this appeal.

I agree with you; this one will be too important an issue for the Supreme Court to just refuse to hear. I guess it is no wonder that MSFT is talking about the integrity of the judicial system as its key point.



To: Daniel G. DeBusschere who wrote (60424)8/7/2001 9:10:57 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74651
 
I doubt the Supreme Court will take the case. What Constitutional issues are implicated? And don't try to tell me Microsoft was deprived of due process, because I'm not buying it.

JMHO.

Charles Tutt (TM)