Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (20921)	8/8/2001 5:30:25 AM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

That's a copy of the same Times article quoted earlier, with the same astrophysicist making the same hypothesis... not proof of anything. I can't find any other details of his proposal, or any scientific responses as yet. Although, given that the website follows with a 'rebuttal' claiming that No matter how much "scientists" and "journalists" will try to distort the facts, three observations made it perfectly clear that the Tunguska event was an explosion of a UFO., I'm not sure it's the best source to quote <g>