Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : IAMR - InterAmerican Resources, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joepcf who wrote (22)	8/8/2001 8:56:28 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 208

I just posted there( CISI as SVED posted ), THUG TALK goes two ways, did the THUGS loose CONTROL to the NICE FOLKS who took over of CISI ??? That must now be the resaon why: Distortion Campaign HERE must be economic all viable to be so heavey into the THUG Distortion Methods here seen. IMHO. I will not reply today. Chucka/Chuca Chucka7 Disclaimer this is not a Buy REC I have disc shares LOOSING VALUE. That is a fact, not sold any YET. Holding for research payoff BIG HIT! THIS IS NOT a BUY REC, this is not a distordeted example LIKE Whysits Chunky COMMENTS did I say it WOULD - no I did not BUT I say read every word now, we have BIG METALS sought in the last moth od News Relaeses, OLd ISSUES go away. ragingbull.lycos.com Respond Next > By: chucka7 $$$ Reply To: 391 by Chuca $$$ Wednesday, 8 Aug 2001 at 8:44 AM EDT Post # of 392 You know what gets me is I replied to a post to as saying- he said, I never saw any PINK that paid a Divedend, so I remembered the Pre 100 Post I laid here about Rand McNally who actually paid a $1.something DIVIDEND way back in 1995 when Rand McNally was a PINK. Now at OTCBB.com at SVED we all see the MM list of ONE ( I think initially it is 30 days of One Market Maker ) on OTCBB:SVED. So - I posted that early SVED Research Link elsewhere in REPLY, to a question, and also state that Little Rand McNally is now on the Bulliten Board at $425 ( four HUndred and twenty five Dollars ), a share NOW! That is an awesome fact in any ones thinking. It is not compareable in any ones logic or is it. FACT: That the $43,000,000 that the OLD STEREO VISION made as a share of Jaws 3( Just 1 HIT is needed here!) and divide that income if made today instead of near that 90's year into shares ISSUED Today as somewwhere way under 15 Million to make it simple. Say $3-ish. Then apply a P.E. ( Price to Earnings Ratio EXACTLY to duplicate RNMC at 141 it works out inthe math BUT that is very high I would settle for 10% TEN PERCENT wouldn't you all a 15 or so PE!) and voila. That would be nice $10 of RAND McNally. Would you take that, would you take more? LOL- I am not saying that an INCREASE of a carry forward to $425 a share is possible in any specific case or sceen, I am saying that strange things can be explained away as to have happen in the past and HISTORY SOMETIMES Goes and HAS a WAY of repeating itself. So why would a short Board Manipilulpalator distort the replay and say are you saying that X Stock will in fact go to $425 a share, nop I did not. I am saying that research prooves that there are very interesting JUST ONE HIT PARAMETERS that can change any given company ( like SVED or Old July Research Work at CISI in Mining ). As I said it really gets me ( not the Slob personal comment ala a real "BOARD THUG" would say and has many times said to me as Chucky or in this case CHUNCKY ) ( Tastes Good ) Hey, " DO YOU SAY THAT IT WILL GO to $425?" Read an example of WHY I get paid to reseach and Now Board Post: ragingbull.lycos.com Click the Referred To Link. Of Limey's QUESTION, I never saw a PINK that paid a dividend. This is how the MM pay folks or capitalize on the Small Flaot in a distortion campaign on small growing companies trying to BREAKOUT OF THEIR SHELLS. They SHUCK. So do the folks that play into the disytortion campaigns, I decalrred That I was paid at BOTH examples BUT THEY never do, see my SVED SEC DISCLOSURE : ragingbull.lycos.com Chucka, Chuca Chucka7 (Voluntary Disclosure: Position- Long; ST Rating- Strong Buy; LT Rating- Strong Buy)