SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (21144)8/9/2001 1:11:36 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
Of course, that might mean that we are both suffering from pompous "I am
right"ness about extremists. <,/i>

LOL! Count me a member of that clan.



To: Rambi who wrote (21144)8/9/2001 1:19:33 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Did you ever read this article, Rambi? It was thrashed around elsewhere when it came out. nytimes.com

A rather obvious irony in the alleged "intolerance of religion" that all us nefarious free-thinkers are supposed to be promoting:

Who would want to be the low man on the voter poll? When asked in
1999 whether they would consider voting for a woman for president, 92
percent of Americans said yes, up from 76 percent in 1978; 95 percent
of respondents would vote for a black, a gain of 22 points since 1978;
Jews were up to 92 percent from 82 in the votability index; even
homosexuals have soared in popularity, acceptable presidential fodder to
59 percent of Americans today, compared with 26 percent in 1978. But
atheists, well, there's no saving them. Of all the categories in this
particular Gallup poll, they scraped bottom, considered worthy
candidates by only 49 percent of Americans, a gain of a mere 9 percent
since 1978. "Throughout American history, there's been this belief that
our country has a covenant with God and that a deity watches over
America," says Michael Cromartie, vice president of the Ethics and
Public Policy Center in Washington. Atheism, in other words, is
practically unpatriotic.


Another bit:

"Society bends over backward to be accommodating to religious
sensibilities but not to other kinds of sensibilities," says Richard Dawkins,
an evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist. "If I say something
offensive to religious people, I'll be universally censured, including by
many atheists. But if I say something insulting about Democrats or
Republicans or the Green Party, one is allowed to get away with that.
Hiding behind the smoke screen of untouchability is something religions
have been allowed to get away with for too long."


Well, personally I figure the Pope ought to be held accountable for that "every sperm is sacred" business that W seems to have picked up on, anyway.



To: Rambi who wrote (21144)8/9/2001 4:49:31 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 82486
 
I don't want the senate praying to Horus or Ra any more than I want them praying to whatever they are praying to now. No praying. No religion. You can hug trees, or pray to Jesus in your private time. And "natural" beliefs- whatever those are (Druids? Wiccans?) have no great attraction for me, or Karen either, I would guess.

Everything religious is objectionable if it is foisted upon those who do not want it. Hari Krishna at the airport annoy me immensely, for example. And ANYONE who comes to my door to peddle religion when I quite clearly have a no soliciting sign can expect to be questioned on their understanding of the English language.