Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Pump's daily trading recs, emphasis on short selling -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pprincesss who wrote (5149)	8/10/2001 12:15:57 AM
From: JustTradeEm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6873

Why would a devotee of Sharck's come here to pump his trading room ???? His site is free, and has been profitable on every* trade* Wow ..... a 100% win rate .... I doubt even Sharck would claim that ! Now, who's pouring it on ?? JB EDIT ... not a member of anyone's site ever so don't really care, just tire of the BS.

To: pprincesss who wrote (5149)	8/10/2001 12:17:43 AM
From: XBrit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6873

Sharck has been profitable on *every* trade? WOWZERS. Gimme a piece of that. Course you may be slightly exaggerating? Or even, massively exaggerating? Nawwww.

To: pprincesss who wrote (5149)	8/10/2001 1:15:13 AM
From: Michail Shadkin	Respond to of 6873

Pprincesss - Next time you indulge in bashing at least dont lie and get the facts straight. "Michail also got caught in a lie on his CSCO call." What are you even referring to????????? What kind of BS statement is this???????????? Btw, congratulations on being "profitable on every trade" I could never match that record in my wildest dreams. Michail

To: pprincesss who wrote (5149)	8/10/2001 1:15:59 AM
From: changedmyname	Respond to of 6873

I really don't think you want me to go there. Jason

To: pprincesss who wrote (5149)	8/10/2001 1:17:52 AM
From: changedmyname	Respond to of 6873

Interesting post, no? Message 15071408 Jason

To: pprincesss who wrote (5149)	8/10/2001 3:56:18 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Respond to of 6873

Don't count those STEM chickens before they hatch. You can't say a trade went against someone short and for someone long until both close their positions... Looking at the WEBM and SPWX charts (and having shorted both successfully before), it looks like they have both rewarded shorts much more than longs. STEM looks to be in the same boat... Aloha

To: pprincesss who wrote (5149)	8/10/2001 7:21:46 AM
From: GREENLAW4-7	Respond to of 6873

PPRINCESS, Perhaps your argument should be geared towards those who create threads, get a following and then after a year or some time drop a bomb and tell the followers togo private. MIC, has never let anyone believe his work on this thread would be for free. I donot think he mislead anyone in actuality he told all from the start he was creating a Private site. There are several others in the SI community who had created a HUGE following and credability only to leave SI and go private. I think SHARCK and MIC both have different styles, one is a position building trade for a longer time frame....MIC. While SHARCK has qwick hits both long and short for a quick trade. Both styles are very successful and an incorporation of both is where you win!! Personally I was EXTREMELY IMPRESSED by MICS trades over the last 2.5 months! No I AM NOT A MEMBER of his PRIVATE SITE!! (YET) I think you should research his moves and then come back and tell me if he has VALUBLE info that is not worthy of a pay site!