Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (77103)	8/10/2001 1:21:05 AM
From: Bilow	Respond to of 93625

Hi Jdaasoc; How the hell am I going to disprove that "4i RDRAM is smaller die size than SDRAM"? I don't know what the die size is for either of em. Uh, neither do you. Hey, if Micron issues a press release that says that their new DDR SDRAM design is smaller in die size than RDRAM are you going to believe it? Re: "So current price schemes for memory are artifical and non sustainable and do not reflect real future costs of manufacturing and contract pricing." You're getting all esoteric and theoretical here on me, and you're using phrases that I can't translate into rational thought. This is not a complicated problem. People are avoiding RDRAM because the memory makers charge too much for it. "The problem is the cost structure. The cost structure never met the goals we had." -- Carl