Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/10/2001 2:06:07 PM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206095

I''ll start with $1.22 on December 11, 2001

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/10/2001 2:35:11 PM
From: Second_Titan	Respond to of 206095

How much of the 26.2 billion KWHR expected to be produced by petroleum in Q4 2001 will stay on #6 oil and/or #2 if NG prices become more favorable. This electric demand is equivalent to ~300 bcf depending on the average heat rate. As long as NG is not curtailed during severe weather if prices become low enough and capability exists to switch I imagine these plants would be jumping all over <$2.50 NG. If the system is full and operating system pressure is high curtailments will be fewer.

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/10/2001 2:38:28 PM
From: Edmond Katonica	Respond to of 206095

Way , Way to deep for me.

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/10/2001 3:10:51 PM
From: jim_p	Respond to of 206095

I'll take $1.80 on 12/31/01. (just in time to write down all those NG reserves booked at $10.00 per Mcf last year) Jim

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/10/2001 3:34:01 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206095

$2.50 October 15.

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/10/2001 9:36:39 PM
From: Mark Adams	Respond to of 206095

I'll take a stab at $2.75 on Sept 7 01. Suspecting that the futures players prevent natgas from seeing a normal low on anticipation of future demand. Of course, I know nothing in comparsion to most on this thread.

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/11/2001 1:00:44 PM
From: dfloydr	Respond to of 206095

You may have seen the lows. The so called "blowdown" situation could almost have been predicted. Now it is hitting some US gas fields and may change the outlook. biz.yahoo.com

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/11/2001 2:21:19 PM
From: Second_Titan	Respond to of 206095

Put me down for $2.50 for the lowest price on October 20,2001. BTW NRC lists two nuclear plants powering down for refueling outages this weekend. North Anna in VA. & Peach Bottom in PA. Refueling takes some time doesnt it? Looks like some NG demand coming back soon.

To: energyplay who wrote (3541)	8/11/2001 8:35:13 PM
From: The Ox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206095

I'll say $2.05 on Feb 10, 2002.