SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (141300)8/10/2001 9:22:07 PM
From: Robert Salasidis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
One can tell where the loyalties of the author lie, when talking about CISC architectures as being inferior when in actual fact most RISC designs have been unable to surpass their performance. In addition it is worded in such a way as to make VLIW/EPIC sound as some lesser offshoot of RISC.

I think it was an Apple loyalist type article meant to justify the G4's existence --> useless



To: Tony Viola who wrote (141300)8/10/2001 11:13:45 PM
From: Yousef  Respond to of 186894
 
Tony,

Re: "Only recently has AMD allowed itself to fall behind in MHz so as
to achieve a more genuine performance increase over that of its x86 competition ..."

So AMD "planned it" this way ... Hahaha ... Right. A real
case of "denial".

Make It So,
Yousef


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News