SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (170245)8/11/2001 11:54:47 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
when it was clear to most that there were no impeachable offenses.

Do you really want to argue that perjury, obstruction of justice, misleading a federal court, submitting false affidavits and misuse of office which Clinton was guilty of are not impeachable offenses? I think that's unwise. Moreover, he was impeached, so they are impeachable offenses. But this is a political decision and offense and in the end the Senate found removal under these facts was not warranted.

JLA



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (170245)8/12/2001 9:00:25 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 769670
 
No, Weinburger was under the cloud of a perjury charge, one that was bogus, in my opinion. In any case, I was not in favor of the Independent Council Act, but if it were wielded against Republicans, it is only fair that Democrats take their chances. Besides, I think that Clinton committed impeachable offenses, and a lot of other stuff that the MacDougals (and others) helped him cover up.......


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News