Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (141339)	8/11/2001 3:18:15 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"I'm guessing that Barrett has far more data at his disposal than the people on this forum who make it their business to make similar claims. I also find it interesting that you are willing to make such a judgement call, given that you no doubt haven't any ideas for what allows him to say those comments." Barrett is a materials scientist (something like a Chemist). Last I heard this doesn't include economics. At the very least he's shooting in the dark...which is about what most economists do anyway. Thats why I'm confident in saying what I said. I've seen bubbles and I've seen bubbles. Y2k was a BUBBLE. R.E. is now a BUBBLE. Bubbles burst even though those with a vested interest like Wall Street would have you believe otherwise. I mean really, look at all the lies perpetuated on the public by so called experts on Wall Street or the financial planners who said "buy the dips for the long run". Jim May take a while for that BMW, sorry.