Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (170359)	8/12/2001 12:45:58 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Why is sex-selection reprehensible and or repugnant, but abortion for convenience sake acceptable?" I''ve already repeated several times that I am not in favor of abortion but do not feel it is my right, particularly as a male, to tell a woman what her decision can be. I find sex-selection abortion particularly repugnant and I find woman who have had multiple abortion's strictly for birth control purposes repugnant. And I strongly disagree with the use of your term abortion of convenience. In the vast number of cases it is a very very difficult decision for a woman, something fanatical self described pro-life males can't seem to understand. "Additionally, would it matter to you if gender selection was predominately female, instead of male? " Of course not, why would you think it would.?? And why would you ask such a question? Now that you understand the" surface level" of my position, see if you can do the same for me with your position.... Why do there seem to be more politically active pro-life males than females..????