Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (21509)	8/11/2001 3:31:34 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

if we do go for plural marriage, so that a person has more than one spouse, would we say he has two spice? Christopher, I told you that you couldn't appreciate the concept as long as you had sex on the brain. But family is not a legally defined term (other than by the Census bureau). Being a member of a family doesn't automatically entite you to any specific legal rights. I know that. I'm presenting an idea here. Make "family" a legally defined term. Or use another term, like "home team" <g> or a made up word. I don't care what we call it. We can even call it "marriage." Parties to it would have rights and responsibilities along the lines of the parties to a marriage. Karen